| |
|
Zymbos Intelligence
AI insight for professionals who act on what they know
|
Issue 005
Apr 2026
|
|
|
|
|
This week: Every AI tool you use either builds on itself over time or resets to zero when you close the tab. The distinction matters more than which tool you choose. Six stories this week, a framework for thinking about your AI stack, and a deep look at a tool that compounds.
|
|
01 · Intelligence Briefing
|
|
|
|
Commerce
Shopify opens the ChatGPT front door for 5.6 million merchants - by default
On 24 March, Shopify Agentic Storefronts went live, making every eligible merchant discoverable inside ChatGPT, Microsoft Copilot, Google AI Mode, and the Gemini app - all managed from a single Shopify Admin dashboard. No separate integrations. No additional fees beyond standard processing. The rollout was opt-out by default: millions of merchants were already participating before they read the announcement email. AI-referred traffic to Shopify stores is up 7x since January 2025. AI-attributed orders are up 11x over the same period.
|
McGann's Take: AI is the new front door to commerce. Discovery now happens in a conversation, not a search bar. The merchants who understand how AI surfaces products - and structure their data accordingly - will capture the highest-intent buyers first.
|
Read more →
|
|
|
Workforce
Jack Dorsey puts it in writing: AI eliminated 4,000 Block employees
Block - the fintech company behind Square and Cash App - reduced its workforce from approximately 10,000 to fewer than 6,000 employees in early March 2026, the largest single workforce reduction explicitly attributed to AI automation in corporate history. CEO Jack Dorsey's public memo was unusually direct: the cuts were not driven by financial difficulty, but by the growing capability of AI tools to perform a wider range of tasks. Customer support roles were most heavily affected. The company simultaneously announced around 800 new hires focused on AI engineering and machine learning operations.
|
McGann's Take: Previous executives blamed market conditions. Dorsey blamed AI and put it in a memo. Once that language is normalised, every boardroom conversation about headcount changes permanently.
|
Read more →
|
|
|
Product
Sora is gone. OpenAI shut its AI video generator and redirected the compute to robotics
OpenAI has confirmed the shutdown of Sora, its AI video generation tool, rerouting the freed compute toward robotics research. The tool launched in early 2024, briefly topped the App Store following its Sora 2 release, generated significant media coverage, and is now discontinued. It is a clean real-world example of a high-profile AI product with an expiry date: impressive in the moment, without the compounding utility that justifies long-term investment.
|
McGann's Take: Sora had hype, headlines, and a moment at the top of the charts. What it didn't have was compounding utility. When the compute is more valuable elsewhere, it moves. Tools without durable use cases don't survive.
|
Read more →
|
|
|
Tools
Perplexity ships Custom Skills and an upgraded memory engine - research that learns your workflow
Custom Skills, which shipped on 6 March for Pro and Max users, allow users to save repeatable research workflows and trigger them on demand - no retyping the same prompt every session. Alongside this, Perplexity's memory engine was significantly upgraded: it now recalls important information in 95% of cases, up from 77%, while generating half as many individual memories. The result is a tool that builds an accurate working picture of how you operate and applies it automatically.
|
McGann's Take: This is compounding in action. A tool that gets better at your specific workflow the more you use it is structurally different from one you have to re-brief every session. That gap widens over time.
|
Read more →
|
|
|
Enterprise
Oracle sets aside $2.1bn for restructuring as the people-for-infrastructure trade spreads across Big Tech
Oracle's planned cuts are not driven by falling revenue or missed targets. The company's remaining performance obligations stood at $523bn last quarter, up 433% year on year. The restructuring - which could affect up to 30,000 employees and is funded by a $50bn AI data centre commitment - is a direct trade: people for infrastructure. Analysts estimate the cuts would free up $8bn to $10bn in cash flow. Amazon, Google, Meta, and Microsoft are running the same calculation at larger scale.
|
McGann's Take: Oracle isn't failing - it's making a deliberate capital allocation decision. When the most profitable version of your business requires fewer people and more servers, you build fewer people and more servers. This is the enterprise playbook now.
|
Read more →
|
|
|
UK · Skills
Only 1 in 39 UK job listings requires AI skills — and most that mention it aren't really asking for it
A Prince AI Training study published on 24 March analysed 1,019 non-technical UK job listings across finance, HR, marketing, sales, legal, and operations — the everyday roles that keep British businesses running. Just 2.6% listed AI skills as a requirement. Traditional tools like Excel and Word appeared 7.5 times more often. ChatGPT appeared in 0.6% of listings. Of the 83 roles that did reference AI, more than half mentioned it only in passing — typically describing the employer's product, not a skill expected of the candidate.
|
McGann's Take: UK businesses aren't measuring AI capability yet — which means the professionals building compounding AI workflows right now are accumulating an advantage that the job market hasn't priced in. That window won't stay open indefinitely.
|
Read more →
|
|
| |
|
|
|
This Week's Analysis
The Two Types of AI Tool. Only One Builds an Advantage.
Every AI tool in your stack falls into one of two categories. Most professionals have never thought about which type they are mostly using. That gap is where the real productivity advantage is hiding.
Tools that compound build value over time. They accumulate context about you, your work, and your patterns. Each session adds something to the next. The output you get on day ninety is better than the output you got on day one - not because the tool changed, but because it has learned how you operate. Custom Skills in Perplexity are a simple example. Claude's memory is another. A well-maintained prompt library that reflects months of refinement is a third.
Tools that expire deliver a single output with no carryover. You get the result, you close the tab, the advantage resets to zero. These tools are not useless - they can be highly effective in the moment. But they do not accumulate. Your competitor who uses the same tool gets the same output. There is no moat.
Sora is the clearest recent example of the expiring category taken to its logical conclusion. Impressive, widely covered, and now shut down. The compute has moved because the value was in the moment, not in what built over time.
|
The professionals who will own their fields in three years are not the ones using the most AI tools. They are the ones who have built a small stack of tools that get better the more they use them.
|
Run this audit on your stack
Take every AI tool you use regularly and ask three questions:
|
1
|
Does it know more about me than it did three months ago? If the answer is no, it is an expiring tool. |
|
|
2
|
Could someone else use this tool today and get the same output as me? If yes, there is no personal advantage being built. |
|
|
3
|
Am I investing time in this tool, or just consuming it? Compounding tools reward the investment. Expiring tools do not. |
|
The goal is not to eliminate expiring tools. Some are genuinely useful in the moment. The goal is to make sure at least part of your stack is compounding - and that you are investing enough time in those tools to let the advantage build.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
AI Research & Search
Perplexity Pro
The research tool that learns how you think
|
|
Perplexity started as a search engine that cited its sources. In March 2026 it has become something more ambitious: an AI research platform that orchestrates multiple frontier models, remembers how you work, and automates repeatable research tasks. The question is not whether it is useful - it clearly is. The question is whether it compounds. The answer is yes, provided you invest in setting it up properly.
| Dimension |
Rating |
Notes |
| Ease of Use |
High |
No technical setup required. Works like a smarter search bar from day one. |
| Research Power |
High |
Deep Research runs on Claude Opus 4.6. Model Council cross-checks answers across multiple frontier models simultaneously. |
| Compounding Potential |
High |
Memory engine at 95% recall. Custom Skills save and rerun repeatable workflows. Advantage grows with sustained use. |
| Value for Money |
Medium |
Pro at £17/mo is well-priced. Max at £166/mo is justified only for heavy professional research use. |
|
Free
Free
Limited searches, standard models
|
Pro
£17 / $20 /mo
Deep Research, Custom Skills, memory
|
Max
£166 / $200 /mo
Computer agent, full model access
|
Enterprise
$40–$325 /user/mo
Pro: $400/yr · Max: $3,250/yr per user
|
|
The Verdict
Perplexity Pro at £17/month is one of the strongest arguments for the compounding tool thesis. The memory engine builds a working picture of your priorities without being prompted. Custom Skills eliminate the drag of retyping the same research brief every Monday morning. Deep Research on Opus 4.6 delivers sourced, auditable analysis that a general-purpose chatbot cannot match - and that gets faster to use the more you invest in configuring it. The free tier is a genuine starting point, but the compounding advantage starts at Pro. If you do substantive research as part of your work - market intelligence, competitor monitoring, industry tracking - this belongs in your core stack.
Try Perplexity →
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Ready to Deploy
The AI Stack Audit
Use in Claude, ChatGPT, or Perplexity. Works best when you list your actual tools.
I want to audit my current AI toolkit to identify which tools are compounding (building value over time through memory, context, or skill) and which are expiring (resetting to zero after each session).
Here are the AI tools I use regularly: [list your tools here]
For each tool, please assess:
1. Whether it is primarily compounding or expiring in how I am currently using it
2. Whether there are features I am not using that would make it compound more
3. What the single highest-value investment I could make in this tool would be (a skill to build, a feature to activate, a habit to form)
End with a ranked recommendation: which one or two tools in my list deserve more deliberate investment based on their compounding potential?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
John McGann
Founder, Zymbos AI · London
|
The conversation about AI in the workplace is dominated by two narratives. The first is productivity: look at everything you can do faster. The second is disruption: look at the jobs that are disappearing. Both are real. Neither is the most important one.
The more important narrative is about accumulation. The professionals and organisations that will define their fields over the next decade are not the ones who adopted AI first. They are the ones who built something durable with it - a stack of tools that compounds, a set of habits that deepens, a capability that a competitor cannot simply replicate by signing up for the same subscription.
Sora is a useful reminder. So is Block. The tools and the roles that survive are the ones that build something that cannot easily reset. Choose your stack accordingly.
John McGann
|
|
|
Zymbos Intelligence
www.zymbos.ai
Privacy Policy
Terms of Use
Unsubscribe
Zymbos Ltd · Company No. 16198848 · Redwood, 31 Broom Road, Teddington, England, TW11 9PT You are receiving this because you subscribed at zymbos.ai
|
|